MSPRC announcement regarding "Self-Calculated Final Conditional Payment Amount" Option


Beginning in February 2012, for settlements of $25,000 or less involving physical trauma based injuries where treatment has been completed, the beneficiary or their representative may be able to obtain a final conditional payment amount prior to settlement. The beneficiary/representative may calculate the final conditional payment amount utilizing information obtained from the MSPRC, the MyMedicare website or other claims information to calculate a proposed final conditional payment amount. The proposed conditional payment amount is then submitted to the MSPRC who will review the amount and if determined to be accurate, will provide the beneficiary/representative with a final conditional payment amount within 60 days. The case must then settle within 60 days of Medicare’s response.

 

The following criteria must be met in order to elect this option:

  1. The liability insurance (including self-insurance) settlement is for a physical trauma based injury. (This means that it does not relate to ingestion, exposure, or medical implant), and
  2. The total liability settlement, judgment, award, or other payment is $25,000 or less, and
  3. The date of incident occurred at least six months before the beneficiary/representative submitted the proposed conditional payment amount to the MSRPC.
  4. The beneficiary demonstrates that treatment has been completed and no further treatment is expected through a written physician  attestation or by certifying in writing that no medical treatment related to the case has occurred for at least ninety days prior to submission of the proposed conditional payment amount to the MSPRC.

The complete explanation, with instructions on how and when to elect this option, are expected to be posted on the website by January 15, 2012.

Of note, the announcement indicates that this is an initial step in providing Medicare’s final conditional payment amount prior to settlement and CMS plans to expand this option as it gains experience with the process.



 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

  • 12/16/2011 2:08 PM Jim Price wrote:
    I am glade to see this development and CMS should be commended for their efforts. However, this does not go far enough in helping our food industry clients. I am hopeful that CMS will come up with a clarification on what they mean by "ingestion." CMS often uses the term to apply to mass torts. The majority of alleged food contamination claims do not end up in mass torts. Further, while this is welcome news, it does not eliminate the need for the reforms our industry is seeking through the SMART Act. We need to continue to strongly support this legislation!
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.